↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
253 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
303 Mendeley
Title
Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005200.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Vennix, Loeki Pelzers, Nicole Bouvy, Geerard L. Beets, Jean-Pierre Pierie, Theo Wiggers, Stephanie Breukink

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 296 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 14%
Researcher 40 13%
Student > Master 40 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 8%
Student > Bachelor 21 7%
Other 70 23%
Unknown 65 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 154 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 9%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 82 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,261,318
of 21,948,630 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,658
of 12,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,177
of 206,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#113
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,948,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.