| Title |
Bone marrow versus peripheral blood allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematological malignancies in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010189.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Udo Holtick, Melanie Albrecht, Jens M Chemnitz, Sebastian Theurich, Nicole Skoetz, Christof Scheid, Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 289 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 11% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 56 | 19% |
| Unknown | 66 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 125 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Unknown | 76 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2019.
All research outputs
#12,898,658
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,834
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,320
of 226,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#168
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.