↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Bone marrow versus peripheral blood allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematological malignancies in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Bone marrow versus peripheral blood allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematological malignancies in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010189.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Udo Holtick, Melanie Albrecht, Jens M Chemnitz, Sebastian Theurich, Nicole Skoetz, Christof Scheid, Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 252 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 15%
Student > Master 35 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 11%
Other 20 8%
Other 62 24%
Unknown 42 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 7%
Unspecified 13 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 4%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 50 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,256,593
of 15,640,467 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,494
of 11,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,940
of 192,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#140
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,640,467 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.