Title |
Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory agents to induce regression and prevent the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004121.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shannon M Grabosch, Osman M Shariff, Judith L Wulff, C. William Helm |
Abstract |
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) precedes the development of invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Current treatment of CIN is quite effective, but there is morbidity for the patient related to pain, bleeding, infection, cervical stenosis and premature birth in subsequent pregnancy. Effective treatment with medications, rather than surgery, would be beneficial. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
Researcher | 11 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 21% |
Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 49% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2018.
All research outputs
#14,657,487
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,845
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,469
of 241,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#184
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.