↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Palliative cytoreductive surgery versus other palliative treatments in patients with unresectable liver metastases from gastro‐entero‐pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Palliative cytoreductive surgery versus other palliative treatments in patients with unresectable liver metastases from gastro‐entero‐pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007118.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Viniyendra Pamecha, Dinesh Sharma, Brian R Davidson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 99 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Professor 8 8%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 29 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 34 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2021.
All research outputs
#20,723,696
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,914
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,108
of 184,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.