↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Palliative cytoreductive surgery versus other palliative treatments in patients with unresectable liver metastases from gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Palliative cytoreductive surgery versus other palliative treatments in patients with unresectable liver metastases from gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007118.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Viniyendra Pamecha, Dinesh Sharma, Brian R Davidson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 74 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Postgraduate 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Professor 8 10%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 16 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2021.
All research outputs
#15,346,546
of 19,157,212 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,995
of 11,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,518
of 282,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#234
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,157,212 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.