| Title |
Interventions for the management of oral submucous fibrosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007156.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zbys Fedorowicz, Edwin Chan Shih‐Yen, Mojtaba Dorri, Mona Nasser, Tim Newton, Luming Shi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Chile | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 135 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 17% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 19% |
| Unknown | 38 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 46 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,484,000
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,196
of 13,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,357
of 106,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.