↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Digitalis for treatment of heart failure in patients in sinus rhythm

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Digitalis for treatment of heart failure in patients in sinus rhythm
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002901.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

William B Hood Jr., Antonio L Dans, Gordon H Guyatt, Roman Jaeschke, John JV McMurray

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Colombia 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 142 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Other 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 30 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 38 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,013,805
of 23,924,386 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,447
of 12,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,840
of 230,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.