↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early erythropoietin for preventing red blood cell transfusion in preterm and/or low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
Title
Early erythropoietin for preventing red blood cell transfusion in preterm and/or low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004863.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arne Ohlsson, Sanjay M Aher

Abstract

Low plasma levels of erythropoietin (EPO) in preterm infants provide a rationale for the use of EPO to prevent or treat anaemia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 155 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 14%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Postgraduate 18 11%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 44 28%
Unknown 23 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 52%
Unspecified 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 28 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,029,889
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,834
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,240
of 226,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#143
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.