↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Type of incision for below knee amputation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
Title
Type of incision for below knee amputation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003749.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul V Tisi, Mary M Than

Abstract

Below knee amputation (BKA) may be necessary in patients with advanced critical limb ischaemia or diabetic foot sepsis in whom no other treatment option is available. There is no consensus as to which surgical technique achieves the maximum rehabilitation potential. This is the third update of the review first published in 2004.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 174 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 22%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Other 37 21%
Unknown 40 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Psychology 4 2%
Unspecified 4 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 45 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,192,741
of 21,190,873 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,226
of 12,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,118
of 205,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#115
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,190,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.