↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Advance provision of emergency contraception for pregnancy prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Advance provision of emergency contraception for pregnancy prevention
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005497.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chelsea B. Polis, David A Grimes, Kate Schaffer, Kelly Blanchard, Anna Glasier, Cynthia Harper

Abstract

Emergency contraception can prevent pregnancy when taken after unprotected intercourse. Obtaining emergency contraception within the recommended time frame is difficult for many women. Advance provision, in which women receive a supply of emergency contraception before unprotected sex, could circumvent some obstacles to timely use.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 127 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 19%
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 14%
Social Sciences 16 12%
Psychology 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 31 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,018,286
of 22,559,301 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,395
of 12,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,424
of 69,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,559,301 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.