↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for treating fingertip entrapment injuries in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for treating fingertip entrapment injuries in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009808.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Capstick, Henk Giele

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 133 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Researcher 14 10%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 13%
Psychology 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 35 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2014.
All research outputs
#6,788,904
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,265
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,760
of 189,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#136
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.