↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Anticoagulants (heparin, low molecular weight heparin and oral anticoagulants) for intermittent claudication

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Anticoagulants (heparin, low molecular weight heparin and oral anticoagulants) for intermittent claudication
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001999.pub2
Pubmed ID
24801382
Authors

Benilde Cosmi, Eleonora Conti, Sergio Coccheri

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 119 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 29 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Unspecified 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 35 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,153,871
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,830
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,936
of 227,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#111
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.