↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Anticoagulants (heparin, low molecular weight heparin and oral anticoagulants) for intermittent claudication

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Anticoagulants (heparin, low molecular weight heparin and oral anticoagulants) for intermittent claudication
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001999.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benilde Cosmi, Eleonora Conti, Sergio Coccheri

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 22%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 21 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,639,193
of 17,362,547 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,220
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,057
of 196,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,362,547 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.