| Title |
Audio‐visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003717.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anneliese Synnot, Rebecca Ryan, Megan Prictor, Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh, Barbara Parker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 527 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 516 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 94 | 18% |
| Researcher | 69 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 60 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 5% |
| Other | 107 | 20% |
| Unknown | 113 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 158 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 61 | 12% |
| Psychology | 60 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 62 | 12% |
| Unknown | 144 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,838,624
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,518
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,722
of 246,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.