↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inhaled hyperosmolar agents for bronchiectasis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
Inhaled hyperosmolar agents for bronchiectasis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002996.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Hart, Karnam Sugumar, Stephen J Milan, Stephen J Fowler, Iain Crossingham

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 155 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 33 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Psychology 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 39 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,316,322
of 16,250,503 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,845
of 11,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,149
of 192,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,250,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.