| Title |
Imipramine for neuropathic pain in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010769.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leslie Hearn, Sheena Derry, Tudor Phillips, R Andrew Moore, Philip J Wiffen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 21% |
| Spain | 3 | 13% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 189 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 18% |
| Unknown | 56 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 5% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 65 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,043,986
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,426
of 12,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,479
of 231,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.