↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Imipramine for neuropathic pain in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
Title
Imipramine for neuropathic pain in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010769.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leslie Hearn, Sheena Derry, Tudor Phillips, R Andrew Moore, Philip J Wiffen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 146 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 19%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 30 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Psychology 6 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 36 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,379,656
of 18,815,546 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,403
of 11,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,305
of 199,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,815,546 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.