↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Angioplasty versus stenting for subclavian artery stenosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Angioplasty versus stenting for subclavian artery stenosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008461.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wagner Iared, José Eduardo Mourão, Andrea Puchnick, Fernando Soma, David Carlos Shigueoka

Abstract

There is insufficient evidence to guide stent usage following angioplasty in subclavian artery stenosis. This is an update of a review first published in 2011.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 23 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,265,654
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,568
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,449
of 242,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#145
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.