↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing injuries in the agricultural industry

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for preventing injuries in the agricultural industry
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006398.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Risto Rautiainen, Marika M Lehtola, Lesley Margaret Day, Eva Schonstein, Juha Suutarinen, Simo Salminen, Jos H Verbeek

Abstract

Agriculture is more hazardous than most other industries. Many strategies have been introduced to reduce injuries in the field, yet the effectiveness of different interventions on occupational injuries still remains unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hong Kong 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 151 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 15%
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 33 21%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 32%
Psychology 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 31 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,503,304
of 17,360,236 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,756
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,717
of 196,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,360,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.