| Title |
Interventions for preventing injuries in the agricultural industry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006398.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Risto Rautiainen, Marika M Lehtola, Lesley Margaret Day, Eva Schonstein, Juha Suutarinen, Simo Salminen, Jos H Verbeek |
| Abstract |
Agriculture is more hazardous than most other industries. Many strategies have been introduced to reduce injuries in the field, yet the effectiveness of different interventions on occupational injuries still remains unclear. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 50% |
| Finland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 189 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 13% |
| Researcher | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 24% |
| Unknown | 44 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 10% |
| Psychology | 16 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 18% |
| Unknown | 51 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,821,609
of 23,674,309 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,077
of 12,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,768
of 158,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,674,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.