↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing injuries in the agricultural industry

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for preventing injuries in the agricultural industry
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006398.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Risto Rautiainen, Marika M Lehtola, Lesley Margaret Day, Eva Schonstein, Juha Suutarinen, Simo Salminen, Jos H Verbeek

Abstract

Agriculture is more hazardous than most other industries. Many strategies have been introduced to reduce injuries in the field, yet the effectiveness of different interventions on occupational injuries still remains unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hong Kong 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 187 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 14%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 39 20%
Unknown 50 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Psychology 16 8%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 59 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,026,672
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,283
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,223
of 168,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.