↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravenous magnesium sulfate for treating adults with acute asthma in the emergency department

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
6 blogs
twitter
120 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
Title
Intravenous magnesium sulfate for treating adults with acute asthma in the emergency department
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010909.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kew, Kayleigh M, Kirtchuk, Liza, Michell, Clare I, Kayleigh M Kew, Liza Kirtchuk, Clare I Michell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 120 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 258 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 17%
Student > Master 40 15%
Researcher 33 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Other 19 7%
Other 55 21%
Unknown 48 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 16%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Psychology 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 52 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2020.
All research outputs
#227,719
of 19,152,115 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#437
of 11,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,331
of 200,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,152,115 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.