| Title |
Antithrombotic drugs for carotid artery dissection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000255.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philippe Lyrer, Stefan Engelter |
| Abstract |
Extracranial internal carotid artery dissection (eICAD) is a leading cause of stroke in younger patients. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 56 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 30% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 65 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,143,584
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,928
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,089
of 99,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.