↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of monotherapy with thiazide diuretics for primary hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
55 tweeters
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of monotherapy with thiazide diuretics for primary hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003824.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vijaya M Musini, Mark Nazer, Ken Bassett, James M Wright

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 292 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 15%
Student > Bachelor 38 13%
Researcher 33 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 8%
Other 64 22%
Unknown 66 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 130 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Neuroscience 7 2%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 76 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2021.
All research outputs
#839,373
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,806
of 12,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,888
of 226,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.