Title |
Blood pressure‐lowering efficacy of monotherapy with thiazide diuretics for primary hypertension
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003824.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vijaya M Musini, Mark Nazer, Ken Bassett, James M Wright |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 19% |
Spain | 9 | 17% |
Canada | 4 | 8% |
Chile | 2 | 4% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Gibraltar | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 45 | 85% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Scientists | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Russia | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 321 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 44 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 38 | 12% |
Researcher | 32 | 10% |
Other | 25 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 8% |
Other | 61 | 19% |
Unknown | 98 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 132 | 41% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 22 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 2% |
Other | 25 | 8% |
Unknown | 109 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#988,392
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,964
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,326
of 240,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.