↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Frequency of administration of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for the anaemia of end-stage kidney disease in dialysis patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Frequency of administration of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for the anaemia of end-stage kidney disease in dialysis patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003895.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deirdre Hahn, June D Cody, Elisabeth M Hodson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 28 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 32 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2014.
All research outputs
#3,500,059
of 17,829,175 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,123
of 11,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,909
of 198,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,829,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.