| Title |
HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for people with chronic kidney disease not requiring dialysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007784.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suetonia C Palmer, Sankar D Navaneethan, Jonathan C Craig, David W Johnson, Vlado Perkovic, Jorgen Hegbrant, Giovanni FM Strippoli |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Chile | 2 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 258 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 54 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 15% |
| Researcher | 26 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 16% |
| Unknown | 65 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 123 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Unknown | 76 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,402,016
of 23,538,320 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,201
of 12,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,544
of 228,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,538,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.