↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Calcium channel blockers for inhibiting preterm labour and birth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
433 Mendeley
Title
Calcium channel blockers for inhibiting preterm labour and birth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002255.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vicki Flenady, Aleena M Wojcieszek, Dimitri NM Papatsonis, Owen M Stock, Linda Murray, Luke A Jardine, Bruno Carbonne

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 433 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 425 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 81 19%
Researcher 60 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 12%
Student > Bachelor 48 11%
Student > Postgraduate 32 7%
Other 71 16%
Unknown 90 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 183 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 12%
Psychology 22 5%
Social Sciences 18 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Other 42 10%
Unknown 107 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#787,957
of 18,845,910 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,913
of 11,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,429
of 200,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,845,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.