↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Calcium channel blockers for inhibiting preterm labour and birth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
520 Mendeley
Title
Calcium channel blockers for inhibiting preterm labour and birth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002255.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vicki Flenady, Aleena M Wojcieszek, Dimitri NM Papatsonis, Owen M Stock, Linda Murray, Luke A Jardine, Bruno Carbonne

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 520 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 513 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 81 16%
Researcher 65 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 12%
Student > Bachelor 54 10%
Student > Postgraduate 39 8%
Other 90 17%
Unknown 129 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 203 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 11%
Psychology 23 4%
Social Sciences 18 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 2%
Other 56 11%
Unknown 150 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2021.
All research outputs
#972,267
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,138
of 12,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,294
of 228,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.