↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Written action plans for asthma in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Written action plans for asthma in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005306.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanjit K. Bhogal, Roger L Zemek, Francine Ducharme

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 200 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 64 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 10%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Psychology 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 73 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,096,904
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,529
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,464
of 65,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.