↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone in non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone in non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006157.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Burdett, Lesley Stewart, Larysa Rydzewska

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 111 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 16%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 9 8%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 28 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 33 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,444,500
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,942
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,443
of 67,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.