| Title |
Iloprost and cisaprost for Raynaud's phenomenon in progressive systemic sclerosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000953 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janet Pope, D Fenlon, A Thompson, Beverley Shea, Dan Furst, George A Wells, Alan Silman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 36 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,444,500
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,942
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,392
of 34,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.