↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Iloprost and cisaprost for Raynaud's phenomenon in progressive systemic sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Iloprost and cisaprost for Raynaud's phenomenon in progressive systemic sclerosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 1998
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000953
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet Pope, D Fenlon, A Thompson, Beverley Shea, Dan Furst, George A Wells, Alan Silman

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Other 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 17 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Linguistics 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 23 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,847,908
of 15,465,366 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,629
of 11,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,464
of 191,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#145
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,465,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.