↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nonlatex versus latex male condoms for contraception

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Nonlatex versus latex male condoms for contraception
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003550.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria F Gallo, David A Grimes, Laureen M Lopez, Kenneth F Schulz

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 73 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Other 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 19 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 25 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2013.
All research outputs
#5,911,056
of 18,104,217 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,243
of 11,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,087
of 199,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#148
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,104,217 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.