↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nonlatex versus latex male condoms for contraception

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Nonlatex versus latex male condoms for contraception
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003550.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria F Gallo, David A Grimes, Laureen M Lopez, Kenneth F Schulz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 76 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 21 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 27 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2021.
All research outputs
#5,568,437
of 19,898,358 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,771
of 11,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,397
of 203,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#132
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,898,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.