| Title |
Drug‐eluting stents versus bare‐metal stents for acute coronary syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012481.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua Feinberg, Emil Eik Nielsen, Janette Greenhalgh, Juliet Hounsome, Naqash J Sethi, Sanam Safi, Christian Gluud, Janus C Jakobsen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 13 | 20% |
| United States | 12 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 12% |
| Ireland | 3 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 17% |
| Scientists | 9 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 254 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 19% |
| Unknown | 83 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 11% |
| Engineering | 10 | 4% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 34 | 13% |
| Unknown | 88 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2023.
All research outputs
#833,395
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,590
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,952
of 328,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.