↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Drug‐eluting stents versus bare‐metal stents for acute coronary syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
59 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Drug‐eluting stents versus bare‐metal stents for acute coronary syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012481.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua Feinberg, Emil Eik Nielsen, Janette Greenhalgh, Juliet Hounsome, Naqash J Sethi, Sanam Safi, Christian Gluud, Janus C Jakobsen

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 266 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 16%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Researcher 22 8%
Other 18 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 6%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 89 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 10%
Engineering 11 4%
Psychology 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 94 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2023.
All research outputs
#898,737
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,661
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,107
of 326,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.