The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid amyloid beta for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008782.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Craig Ritchie, Nadja Smailagic, Anna H Noel‐Storr, Yemisi Takwoingi, Leon Flicker, Sam E Mason, Rupert McShane |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Chile | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 92% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 387 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 379 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 14% |
| Researcher | 48 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 64 | 17% |
| Unknown | 109 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 111 | 29% |
| Psychology | 27 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 26 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 56 | 14% |
| Unknown | 125 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,765,766
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,593
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,672
of 245,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#69
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.