↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tailored interventions based on sputum eosinophils versus clinical symptoms for asthma in children and adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
Title
Tailored interventions based on sputum eosinophils versus clinical symptoms for asthma in children and adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005603.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen L Petsky, Albert Li, Anne B Chang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 254 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 10%
Student > Master 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 25 10%
Other 22 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 7%
Other 47 18%
Unknown 92 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 100 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,869,769
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,006
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,647
of 325,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.