↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tailored interventions based on sputum eosinophils versus clinical symptoms for asthma in children and adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Tailored interventions based on sputum eosinophils versus clinical symptoms for asthma in children and adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005603.pub3
Authors

Helen L Petsky, Albert Li, Anne B Chang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 168 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 14%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Other 15 9%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 38 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 42 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,179,303
of 16,645,672 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,155
of 11,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,018
of 275,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,645,672 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.