↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for rhabdomyolysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
Title
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for rhabdomyolysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008566.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoxi Zeng, Ling Zhang, Taixiang Wu, Ping Fu

Abstract

Rhabdomyolysis is a condition that is characterised by the breakdown of skeletal muscle tissue and leakage of intracellular myocyte contents into circulating blood. Rhabdomyolysis can lead to acute kidney injury (AKI) and is a potentially life-threatening condition. Studies have indicated that continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may provide benefits for people with rhabdomyolysis by removing potentially damaging myoglobin and stabilising haemodynamic and metabolic status.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 171 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Other 15 9%
Researcher 13 8%
Other 42 24%
Unknown 40 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 10%
Unspecified 10 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 48 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2023.
All research outputs
#13,527,710
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,314
of 12,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,304
of 229,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#193
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.