Title |
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for rhabdomyolysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008566.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiaoxi Zeng, Ling Zhang, Taixiang Wu, Ping Fu |
Abstract |
Rhabdomyolysis is a condition that is characterised by the breakdown of skeletal muscle tissue and leakage of intracellular myocyte contents into circulating blood. Rhabdomyolysis can lead to acute kidney injury (AKI) and is a potentially life-threatening condition. Studies have indicated that continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may provide benefits for people with rhabdomyolysis by removing potentially damaging myoglobin and stabilising haemodynamic and metabolic status. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 50% |
Hungary | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 171 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 29 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
Other | 15 | 9% |
Researcher | 13 | 8% |
Other | 42 | 24% |
Unknown | 40 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 10% |
Unspecified | 10 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 3% |
Psychology | 5 | 3% |
Other | 19 | 11% |
Unknown | 48 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2023.
All research outputs
#13,527,710
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,314
of 12,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,304
of 229,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#193
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.