↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological interventions for individuals with cystic fibrosis and their families

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
619 Mendeley
Title
Psychological interventions for individuals with cystic fibrosis and their families
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003148.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lutz Goldbeck, Astrid Fidika, Marion Herle, Alexandra L Quittner

Abstract

With increasing survival estimates for individuals with cystic fibrosis, long-term management has become an important focus. Psychological interventions are largely concerned with adherence to treatment, emotional and social adaptation and health-related quality of life. We are unaware of any relevant systematic reviews.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 619 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 614 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 105 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 13%
Student > Bachelor 81 13%
Researcher 64 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 6%
Other 88 14%
Unknown 161 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 143 23%
Psychology 100 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 77 12%
Social Sciences 38 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 2%
Other 61 10%
Unknown 189 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2014.
All research outputs
#12,839,883
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,794
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,105
of 228,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#182
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.