↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002912.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lapitan MC, Cody JD

Abstract

Urinary incontinence is a common and potentially debilitating problem. Open retropubic colposuspension is a surgical treatment which involves lifting the tissues near the bladder neck and proximal urethra in the area behind the anterior pubic bones to correct deficient urethral closure.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Spain 1 4%
Singapore 1 4%
Argentina 1 4%
Unknown 22 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 23%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 3 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2014.
All research outputs
#2,087,668
of 4,507,509 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,488
of 7,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,834
of 107,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 52nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.