↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interconception care for women with a history of gestational diabetes for improving maternal and infant outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
374 Mendeley
Title
Interconception care for women with a history of gestational diabetes for improving maternal and infant outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010211.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanna Tieu, Emily Shepherd, Philippa Middleton, Caroline A Crowther

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 374 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 16%
Researcher 40 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 10%
Student > Bachelor 36 10%
Student > Postgraduate 17 5%
Other 56 15%
Unknown 127 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 14%
Social Sciences 18 5%
Psychology 8 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 32 9%
Unknown 145 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,865,457
of 24,877,869 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,542
of 12,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,027
of 322,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#193
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,877,869 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.