| Title |
Ambulatory oxygen for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who are not hypoxaemic at rest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000238.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Faisal Ameer, Kristin V Carson, Zafar A Usmani, Brian J Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 11% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 234 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 10% |
| Researcher | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 18% |
| Unknown | 75 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 11% |
| Psychology | 11 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 80 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,973,931
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,203
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,361
of 243,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.