↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ambulatory oxygen for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who are not hypoxaemic at rest

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
Title
Ambulatory oxygen for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who are not hypoxaemic at rest
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000238.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Faisal Ameer, Kristin V Carson, Zafar A Usmani, Brian J Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 239 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Researcher 21 9%
Other 14 6%
Other 42 18%
Unknown 80 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 11%
Psychology 11 5%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 87 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,973,931
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,203
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,361
of 243,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.