Title |
Angioplasty versus bare metal stenting for superficial femoral artery lesions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006767.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mohammed M Chowdhury, Alexander D McLain, Christopher P Twine |
Abstract |
Lower limb peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common, important manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis. Stenoses or occlusions in the superficial femoral artery may result in intermittent claudication or even critical ischaemia, which may be treated by balloon angioplasty with or without stenting. This is the first update of a review published in 2009. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Argentina | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 187 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
Researcher | 22 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
Other | 31 | 16% |
Unknown | 56 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 45% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
Psychology | 4 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 9% |
Unknown | 63 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,131,235
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,557
of 12,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,851
of 228,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#135
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.