| Title |
Staples versus sutures for closing leg wounds after vein graft harvesting for coronary artery bypass surgery.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008057.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fausto Biancari, Valentina Tiozzo |
| Abstract |
Surgical site infection (SSI) after saphenous vein graft harvesting is a complication occurring in up to 18% of patients who undergo coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). It is not known whether the method of skin closure influences the infection rate. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,154,288
of 23,400,864 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,720
of 12,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,541
of 96,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,400,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.