↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Staples versus sutures for closing leg wounds after vein graft harvesting for coronary artery bypass surgery.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Staples versus sutures for closing leg wounds after vein graft harvesting for coronary artery bypass surgery.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008057.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fausto Biancari, Valentina Tiozzo

Abstract

Surgical site infection (SSI) after saphenous vein graft harvesting is a complication occurring in up to 18% of patients who undergo coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). It is not known whether the method of skin closure influences the infection rate.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Postgraduate 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Psychology 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 11 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,283,833
of 18,217,940 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,917
of 11,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,792
of 195,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,217,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.