↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Non-steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy compared with luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonists or surgical castration monotherapy for advanced prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Non-steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy compared with luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonists or surgical castration monotherapy for advanced prostate cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009266.pub2
Pubmed ID
24979481
Authors

Frank Kunath, Henrik R Grobe, Gerta Rücker, Edith Motschall, Gerd Antes, Philipp Dahm, Bernd Wullich, Joerg J Meerpohl

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 179 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 47 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 55 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2014.
All research outputs
#6,356,644
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,185
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,553
of 226,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#155
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.