↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy compared with luteinising hormone–releasing hormone agonists or surgical castration monotherapy for advanced prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
Title
Non‐steroidal antiandrogen monotherapy compared with luteinising hormone–releasing hormone agonists or surgical castration monotherapy for advanced prostate cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009266.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank Kunath, Henrik R Grobe, Gerta Rücker, Edith Motschall, Gerd Antes, Philipp Dahm, Bernd Wullich, Joerg J Meerpohl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 198 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 58 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 67 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2014.
All research outputs
#14,664,298
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,587
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,281
of 242,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#183
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.