Title |
Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009901.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Reinhard Strametz, Christoph Pachler, Johanna F Kramer, Christian Byhahn, Andrea Siebenhofer, Tobias Weberschock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
Fiji | 1 | 17% |
Spain | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 153 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 27 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 12% |
Researcher | 15 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 10% |
Other | 11 | 7% |
Other | 27 | 18% |
Unknown | 41 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 11% |
Psychology | 11 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 9% |
Unknown | 43 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2014.
All research outputs
#7,746,663
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,610
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,883
of 241,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#157
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.