↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapies for common mental disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
596 Mendeley
Title
Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapies for common mental disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004687.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allan A Abbass, Steve R Kisely, Joel M Town, Falk Leichsenring, Ellen Driessen, Saskia De Maat, Andrew Gerber, Jack Dekker, Sven Rabung, Svitlana Rusalovska, Elizabeth Crowe

Abstract

Since the mid-1970s, short-term psychodynamic psychotherapies (STPP) for a broad range of psychological and somatic disorders have been developed and studied. Early published meta-analyses of STPP, using different methods and samples, have yielded conflicting results, although some meta-analyses have consistently supported an empirical basis for STPP. This is an update of a review that was last updated in 2006.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 596 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 584 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 93 16%
Researcher 75 13%
Student > Bachelor 74 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 51 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 8%
Other 135 23%
Unknown 119 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 220 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 122 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 5%
Social Sciences 22 4%
Unspecified 17 3%
Other 53 9%
Unknown 134 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#584,920
of 24,469,913 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,098
of 12,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,481
of 232,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,469,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.