↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapies for common mental disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
502 Mendeley
Title
Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapies for common mental disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004687.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allan A Abbass, Steve R Kisely, Joel M Town, Falk Leichsenring, Ellen Driessen, Saskia De Maat, Andrew Gerber, Jack Dekker, Sven Rabung, Svitlana Rusalovska, Elizabeth Crowe

Abstract

Since the mid-1970s, short-term psychodynamic psychotherapies (STPP) for a broad range of psychological and somatic disorders have been developed and studied. Early published meta-analyses of STPP, using different methods and samples, have yielded conflicting results, although some meta-analyses have consistently supported an empirical basis for STPP. This is an update of a review that was last updated in 2006.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 502 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 489 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 16%
Researcher 75 15%
Student > Bachelor 61 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 9%
Other 110 22%
Unknown 80 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 200 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 115 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 5%
Social Sciences 23 5%
Neuroscience 9 2%
Other 38 8%
Unknown 92 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,288,683
of 18,950,555 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,196
of 11,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,895
of 197,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,950,555 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.