| Title |
Aspirin and/or heparin for women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage with or without inherited thrombophilia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004734.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paulien G de Jong, Stef Kaandorp, Marcello Di Nisio, Mariëtte Goddijn, Saskia Middeldorp |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 40% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 10% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 10% |
| Ireland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 360 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 12% |
| Other | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 76 | 21% |
| Unknown | 93 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 178 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 4% |
| Psychology | 12 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 8% |
| Unknown | 103 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,205,384
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,701
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,818
of 242,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#121
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.