↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Combination of tocolytic agents for inhibiting preterm labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
346 Mendeley
Title
Combination of tocolytic agents for inhibiting preterm labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006169.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua P Vogel, Juan Manuel Nardin, Therese Dowswell, Helen M West, Olufemi T Oladapo

Abstract

Preterm birth represents the single largest cause of mortality and morbidity for newborns and a major cause of morbidity for pregnant women. Tocolytic agents include a wide range of drugs that can inhibit labour to prolong pregnancy. This may gain time to allow the fetus to mature further before being born, permit antenatal corticosteroid administration for lung maturation, and allow time for intra-uterine transfer to a hospital with neonatal intensive care facilities. However, some tocolytic drugs are associated with severe side effects. Combinations of tocolytic drugs may be more effective over single tocolytic agents or no intervention, without adversely affecting the mother or neonate.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 341 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 14%
Student > Bachelor 42 12%
Researcher 40 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 9%
Other 22 6%
Other 51 15%
Unknown 109 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 134 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 9%
Psychology 11 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 3%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Other 36 10%
Unknown 114 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,057,698
of 26,266,588 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,415
of 13,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,649
of 242,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#148
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,266,588 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.