Title |
Governance arrangements for health systems in low‐income countries: an overview of systematic reviews
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2017
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011085.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cristian A Herrera, Simon Lewin, Elizabeth Paulsen, Agustín Ciapponi, Newton Opiyo, Tomas Pantoja, Gabriel Rada, Charles S Wiysonge, Gabriel Bastías, Sebastian Garcia Marti, Charles I Okwundu, Blanca Peñaloza, Andrew D Oxman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 32% |
Kenya | 2 | 11% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | 5% |
Colombia | 1 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
Nigeria | 1 | 5% |
Congo | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 26% |
Scientists | 3 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 665 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 665 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 92 | 14% |
Researcher | 80 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 61 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 8% |
Other | 32 | 5% |
Other | 107 | 16% |
Unknown | 237 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 157 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 84 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 46 | 7% |
Psychology | 20 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 17 | 3% |
Other | 86 | 13% |
Unknown | 255 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,292,021
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,617
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,756
of 327,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#116
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.