↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Calcium antagonists for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
494 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Calcium antagonists for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000277.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanne Dorhout Mees, Gabriel JE Rinkel, Valery L Feigin, Ale Algra, Walter M van den Bergh, Marinus Vermeulen, Jan van Gijn

Abstract

Secondary ischaemia is a frequent cause of poor outcome in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Its pathogenesis has been incompletely elucidated, but vasospasm probably is a contributing factor. Experimental studies have suggested that calcium antagonists can prevent or reverse vasospasm and have neuroprotective properties.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 329 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 14%
Student > Master 43 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 11%
Student > Bachelor 35 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 8%
Other 63 19%
Unknown 82 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 163 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 6%
Neuroscience 17 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 27 8%
Unknown 90 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,456,555
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,972
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,381
of 79,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.