↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Calcium antagonists for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
466 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Calcium antagonists for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000277.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanne Dorhout Mees, Gabriel JE Rinkel, Valery L Feigin, Ale Algra, Walter M van den Bergh, Marinus Vermeulen, Jan van Gijn

Abstract

Secondary ischaemia is a frequent cause of poor outcome in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Its pathogenesis has been incompletely elucidated, but vasospasm probably is a contributing factor. Experimental studies have suggested that calcium antagonists can prevent or reverse vasospasm and have neuroprotective properties.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 303 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 14%
Student > Master 42 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 11%
Student > Bachelor 34 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 8%
Other 61 20%
Unknown 66 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 155 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 6%
Neuroscience 16 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 26 8%
Unknown 74 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,360,764
of 24,172,513 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,869
of 12,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,967
of 69,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,172,513 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.