↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Amantadine for fatigue in multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
Title
Amantadine for fatigue in multiple sclerosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002818.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugenio Pucci, Pedro Brañas Tato, Roberto D'Amico, Giorgio Giuliani, Alessandra Solari, Cristiana Taus

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 175 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Other 14 8%
Other 46 25%
Unknown 36 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Neuroscience 12 7%
Psychology 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 42 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,805,747
of 20,981,820 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,646
of 12,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,705
of 207,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#156
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,981,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.