↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Long-acting beta2-agonists for poorly reversible chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
Title
Long-acting beta2-agonists for poorly reversible chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001104.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Appleton, Phillippa Poole, Brian J Smith, Antony Veale, Toby J Lasserson, Matthew Ming Ki Chan, Christopher J Cates

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 146 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 19%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 41 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 43 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,165,464
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,621
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,555
of 65,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.