↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Relaxation for perimenopausal and postmenopausal symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
Title
Relaxation for perimenopausal and postmenopausal symptoms
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008582.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suprawita Saensak, Teraporn Vutyavanich, Woraluk Somboonporn, Manit Srisurapanont

Abstract

Since the time of publication of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study, menopausal symptom management has become more complex because of increased awareness of the risks associated with hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Currently, a wide range of management options is available. Some women take prescription drugs, and others use self care strategies, including lifestyle modifications, over-the-counter preparations and complementary and alternative therapies, such as herbal preparations, exercise programmes and relaxation techniques. Relaxation techniques consist of a group of behavioural interventions. They are considered relatively harmless, but their effectiveness in treating vasomotor symptoms and sleep disturbances remains debatable.  OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of relaxation techniques as treatment for vasomotor symptoms and associated sleep disturbances in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 207 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 20%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Researcher 19 9%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 42 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 12%
Psychology 24 11%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Sports and Recreations 7 3%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 45 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,766,839
of 17,353,889 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,307
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,122
of 199,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,353,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.