↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Water-based exercise for adults with asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
Title
Water-based exercise for adults with asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010456.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Jose Grande, Valter Silva, Brenda NG Andriolo, Rachel Riera, Sergio A Parra, Maria S Peccin

Abstract

Asthma is a common condition characterised by airway inflammation and airway narrowing, which can result in intermittent symptoms of wheezing, coughing and chest tightness, possibly limiting activities of daily life. Water-based exercise is believed to offer benefits for people with asthma through pollen-free air, humidity and effects of exercise on physical function.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 290 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 15%
Student > Bachelor 41 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 9%
Researcher 21 7%
Other 18 6%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 99 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 15%
Sports and Recreations 17 6%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Other 31 10%
Unknown 111 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2016.
All research outputs
#6,248,481
of 21,343,037 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,125
of 12,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,931
of 208,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#150
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,343,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.