↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Anticoagulant and aspirin prophylaxis for preventing thromboembolism after major gynaecological surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Anticoagulant and aspirin prophylaxis for preventing thromboembolism after major gynaecological surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003679.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arianna D'Angelo, Ben Willem J Mol

Abstract

The reported overall risk of deep venous thrombosis in gynaecological surgery ranges from 7 to 45%. Fatal pulmonary embolism is estimated to occur in nearly 1% of these women. Pharmaceutical interventions are one possible prophylactic measure for preventing emboli in women undergoing major gynaecological surgery. Agents include unfractionated heparin (low -dose and adjusted-dose), low-molecular-weight heparins, heparinoids and warfarin.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 16%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Professor 3 12%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2014.
All research outputs
#15,358,844
of 19,172,905 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,002
of 11,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,971
of 203,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#201
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,172,905 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.