| Title |
Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for treating keratoconus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009700.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miriam Keane, Douglas Coster, Mohammed Ziaei, Keryn Williams |
| Abstract |
Keratoconus is an ectatic (weakening) disease of the cornea, which is the clear surface at the front of the eye. Approximately 10% to 15% of patients diagnosed with keratoconus require corneal transplantation. This may be full-thickness (penetrating) or partial-thickness (lamellar). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 225 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 9% |
| Researcher | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 42 | 19% |
| Unknown | 75 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 85 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,941,088
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,562
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,251
of 228,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#173
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.