↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
Title
Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004732.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jodie M Dodd, Elizabeth R Anderson, Simon Gates, Rosalie M Grivell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Rwanda 1 <1%
Unknown 213 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Postgraduate 29 14%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Other 47 22%
Unknown 36 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Psychology 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 43 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,976,763
of 17,353,889 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,627
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,933
of 199,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#113
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,353,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.