| Title |
Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004732.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jodie M Dodd, Elizabeth R Anderson, Simon Gates, Rosalie M Grivell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 298 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 65 | 22% |
| Unknown | 83 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 139 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Unknown | 89 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,680,617
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,852
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,666
of 239,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#135
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.