↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
Title
Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004732.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jodie M Dodd, Elizabeth R Anderson, Simon Gates, Rosalie M Grivell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Rwanda 1 <1%
Unknown 254 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 33 13%
Student > Master 32 13%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Other 59 23%
Unknown 57 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 129 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 8%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Psychology 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 60 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,052,740
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,506
of 12,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,980
of 229,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#133
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.