↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
312 Mendeley
Title
Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004732.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jodie M Dodd, Elizabeth R Anderson, Simon Gates, Rosalie M Grivell

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Rwanda 1 <1%
Unknown 311 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 12%
Researcher 34 11%
Student > Postgraduate 33 11%
Other 25 8%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Other 61 20%
Unknown 98 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 142 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 7%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Psychology 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 103 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,941,178
of 26,409,992 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,114
of 13,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,522
of 239,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,409,992 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.